he last paragraph said that it is impossible to satisfy everyone, but it must be done to satisfy your leaders. It's not a matter of flattery, it's a matter of priority.
I am very disgusted with the online saying that the post-00s need to rectify the workplace and insist on the right leadership. Whoever wants to teach you this email list is either stupid or bad. The leader recruits you to let you help him solve problems, not to create more problems; secondly, your height and working years determine that your cognition is one-sided; even if you are justified, you should adopt more EQ way.
We have all heard that a new Huawei employee wrote a ten thousand words letter to Ren Zhengfei and was fired. I think Ren Zhengfei's inner thoughts when he saw this letter should be the same as we encountered some outrageous user feedback: "You know a P". The main contradiction here is whether your cognition can be equated with the leader's cognition, and whether you can establish sufficient trust with the leader. If the Wanyan Book was written by Yu Chengdong, Ren Zhengfei would definitely think word by word. .
To solve these two contradictions, there is only one way, that is to complete every task assigned by the leader, and the leader will trust you over time, and the more trust you are, the more advanced things you will be allowed to do. When you really gain the trust of the leader, or have a certain authority, then your suggestions will be heard. So if you want to change the status quo, you should not be an angry youth, but try to be someone who can change the status quo.
In addition, when doing it, you have to think about what is the meaning of doing it, if there is no sense why the leader should do it, why the leader did not adopt what I think is a better way, and so on. You must know that it is your responsibility to complete the tasks assigned by the leader, but independent thinking is your responsibility.